Former Attorney-General and Minister for Justice Godfred Yeboah Dame on Monday, October 6, appeared before the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) in Accra to respond to serious allegations filed by Richard Jakpa, Director of Special Operations at the National Security Secretariat.
Jakpa’s petition accuses Dame of fabricating evidence, intimidating testimony, and instructing him to delay court proceedings by procuring a false medical excuse.
This dramatic turn has gripped Ghana’s legal and political scene. Below is a breakdown of the case, key allegations, reactions, and what comes next.
Table of Contents
What Is the Jakpa Petition About?
The petition, dated September 23, 2025, alleges that while serving as Attorney-General, Mr. Dame attempted to influence Jakpa’s testimony in the high-profile ambulance procurement trial involving Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson and Jakpa himself.
Jakpa claims that on March 26, 2024, Dame called him, pressuring him to testify to match the AG’s narrative on the “Letters of Credit” issue central to the trial. When Jakpa objected, Dame reportedly insisted there would be no consequences and even suggested he obtain a medical excuse to delay proceedings until Dame returned from abroad. Jakpa says he refused this “dishonest, unethical” offer.
If proven, these acts could constitute the criminal offense of fabrication of evidence, and raise deep concerns about the integrity of prosecutorial conduct in Ghana.
Godfred Dame at the CID: What Happened
On October 6, Dame showed up at CID headquarters flanked by a large legal team, including former deputies and party lawyers.
Reports indicate over 70 lawyers accompanied him to make statements and ensure his rights were preserved.
The CID now faces the task of reviewing the petition, examining evidence (including audio recordings of the alleged phone call), and collecting statements from both parties involved.
Reactions, Disputes & Political Underpinnings
Claims of Political Motives
Some voices in the legal and political community suggest the petition is politically motivated. Former Deputy AG Alfred Tuah Yeboah has described the petition as a smear campaign rooted in partisanship.
Opposition from Legal Figures
Frank Davies, NPP legal committee chairman, criticized the police’s decision to reopen the case. He questioned whether the CID is trying to overrule res judicata, pointing out that the High Court had already adjudicated aspects of the ambulance case.
Davies said: “What is there to investigate again? The court has already passed judgment.”
Why This Matter Grabs National Attention
- Integrity of the Attorney-General’s office
If a former AG is accused of fabricating evidence or coaching witnesses, it strikes at the heart of Ghana’s public trust in justice. - Legal precedent and prosecutorial accountability
How CID handles this matter could set a benchmark for how powerful legal figures are scrutinized in the future. - Partisan optics
The case is unfolding in a charged political climate. Many will view it through a lens of party politics, likely amplifying public interest and polarization. - Public confidence in major trials
The ambulance procurement case is already high-profile. Allegations of misconduct by a former AG may shake confidence in major corruption and procurement trials moving forward.
What Happens Next?
- The CID will review evidence: audio recordings, petition documents, and sworn testimonies from both sides.
- They may call additional witnesses or hold interviews under oath.
- CID will assess whether to file formal charges against Dame or dismiss the petition.
- Depending on the outcome, this may go to court or trigger further parliamentary or ethical reviews.
FAQs – People Also Ask
Why is Godfred Dame trending now?
He is trending because he reported to the CID over a petition accusing him of fabricating evidence during his time as Attorney-General.
What are the allegations against Godfred Dame?
That he attempted to influence testimony, fabricate evidence, and suggest false medical excuses to delay proceedings.
Is the petition valid legally?
The petition appears to raise serious allegations. However, its strength will depend on evidence, standards of proof, and whether the offences alleged are prosecutable under Ghana’s laws.
What could be the outcome?
Outcomes range from CID dismissing the case, formal charges against Dame, or judicial proceedings. The decision will affect public trust in legal institutions.
Final Thoughts
This is not just a story of one man; it’s a story about accountability, law, and power in Ghana’s justice system. The CID’s handling of Godfred Dame’s case will be watched closely by every legal mind, political observer, and citizen who cares about fairness.
If you want more updates, deeper analysis, and full coverage of every twist, stay with xorlali.com.
